🔗 Share this article

The Four Spent the Day Together is populated with protagonists pursuing clean slates, struggling to escape substance abuse or harmful partnerships, only to witness hope devolve into conflict. The author often employs the phrase "fresh start", making it willfully cynical through constant reiteration. Examples include "He aimed to start over" and "They decided to make a fresh start" appear throughout the narrative. At the same time, the author herself is embarking on her own fresh start, as this appears a novel form of writing – observational, truly literary. But then it proves to be laden with the recurring issues and approaches as earlier books.

From Unplanned Author to Cult Classic

The writer was originally an creative who entered the literary world almost accidentally with her 1997 groundbreaking book I Love Dick, made up of letters to an unreceptive lover, elevating intimate women's literature from self-debasement into rebellion. She persisted as a writer, but the following three engaging and challenging novels missed the power and directness that the epistolary style infused into the voice of I Love Dick. This was not aided by was her position as a renegade artist who had turned into a extensive real estate holder, so there was much discussion on real estate deals. It makes sense that she now wants to explore different types of content, directing her gaze to other people's stories, at a period in which she states that Trumpian politics turns intimate literature obsolete.

Three Generations, One Unescapable Past

The Four Spent the Day Together is divided into three sections, covering three generations – all unable to escape their histories. We encounter the story of Emma and Jasper, representations of her own mother and father, relocating from the New York borough to the Connecticut countryside. Additionally the narrative of the author, in the character of Catt Greene, reckoning with the delayed acclaim of I Love Dick, the ascent of a political figure, and her substance-dependent spouse a man named Paul. The third thread involves the narrative of a homicide of one directionless individual by another in a town largely deserted by liberal ideals only 80 miles from Catt's rural residence in a remote part of Minnesota.

For this reader drawn to refined literature of the kind Kraus often avoids, I was seduced by the novelistic voice of the opening part.

As a reader drawn to honed writing of the variety that Kraus herself usually avoids, I was won over by the storytelling approach of the first section. It exhibits a new quality of attentiveness that makes room for trivial aspects, like the container that the protagonist as a child dislodges from ice at the beginning of the narrative, aided by her cherished parent. "I found an ice toy!" she declares; "a lovely toy", he replies, "the elliptical meanings of words circulating in their speech like piece candy". Kraus writes Emma's story with curiosity and intimacy. "Emma felt like she'd stepped into a dream – not precisely her dream."

Disappointment and Disjunction

I was fated to feel let down when I wished this new voice could last out the book. Kraus says here that she resents the pleasure those who appreciate polished prose have derived from I Love Dick; she's committed to disruption, to the untidy aesthetics she has in common with her inspiration writer Kathy Acker, and the emptiness and redundancy of her past books reasserts itself in the middle section. The protagonist is working on refurbishing multiple decrepit residences in the city's most challenging districts while shuttling between the Midwest and the West Coast, failing to help Paul curb his addiction. She experiences powerlessness as her spouse moves between low-resource employment as an recovery specialist in a environment propelled by the anger and fear that underpins an electoral success. There are several pages about Catt being cancelled on a platform, her professional designation altered from "writer" to "landlord" on the online encyclopedia. The author still appears to be overly concerned about this. In a moment she states that she's researching the homicide so that before departing the state, "she could potentially understand something about an America that her Twitter detractors would not understand, would not even perceive".

The Murder Narrative

So then we come to the actual killing – and the referenced day spent by the deceased with the murderer and his friends. The author possesses excellent raw material, and knows hour by hour what occurred as Brandon came to meet Brittney after meeting her on an app where she offered adult photos. He was hoping for sex but seems amiably to have occupied the day alongside her friends, wandering about getting his car mended and paying for snacks and drugs, before being murdered by Brittney's partner a man named Micah – a individual with mental health challenges who has frequently been hospitalised for violent rage.

Preoccupation and Open Ends

The protagonist becomes fixated by the account, and I was intrigued by the way that Kraus's dual urges towards responsible documentation and audacious rule-breaking clash in this segment. However, I would have preferred her to go further into her individual preoccupations here. The compelling persona is Brittney herself, who comes alive partially because of Catt seeing herself in her – yet another intelligent, harassed young woman spiraling out of control in a difficult, overlooked locality. The author informs us that Catt speaks to Brittney in detention, but she fails to enact these dialogues. The complete segment feels oddly unfinished, to the degree that her narrative ends almost mid-par